🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts about the comments made by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz during the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is from the US – and sports frequently encourage nationalism. Some disappointment would have been appropriate. Rather, Fowler invoked the continued drought of US male players at the majors: not one of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, me too. But really. Even if the American defeated the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the following match, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been title holder the Italian, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven grand slams (and the Spaniard went on to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he in fact liked his path, because it offered the chance to defeat the three best competitors in the world in succession. Fritz is more than justified to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match what other person in their right mind had the drought of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing between her and sustained success

Fritz, 28, is placed fourth in the global rankings starting the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his last six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that is as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class serve and powerful power on both forehand and backhand are more than adequate to dispose of the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. Against the select few generational talents, though, Fritz is frequently overmatched. The past few years has witnessed the interesting emergence of tall, gangly athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming speed and fluidity of much shorter players. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and playing a drop shot against him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

The American has made a number of dramatic, improbable advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded up to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a declining Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing slump of US male players winning grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

The American star made a personal best advancement to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

The American's play in that very quarter-final should have been enough of an sign. The Serbian triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only felt tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the point of frustration. When he finally did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly played a horrendous service game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and forced him to expend excessive effort to prevail. Down match points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the match twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately committed two errors. It was not a choke, in my opinion, just a consequence of needing to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was quite compelling proof that Fritz is not good enough to beat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and never particularly seem like he believed he could win. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has acquired enough experience and strategic intelligence to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is those who were expecting the American to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he could.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective presence in press conferences, exceeding virtually anyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, prepared to not just express how he feels or the tactic he believed decided a contest, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for America failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unfair. (Now that Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, maybe they can share that load.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” the American told an interviewer in June of claiming a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely unlikely for everybody else. {