🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has developed a commercial tone, expanding to include gatherings where African descendants are compensated to speak with white audiences about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in October in the UK, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the celebration is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a source of worry. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the European continent as a whole.

In the US, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A campaign to scrub Black history and legacy from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance represents how minimally it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves simple recognition of the bygone era when it fails to address the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if anti-racism is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.