🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.